Form follows you

Andrew Webb, Principal at WD Architects

Author Justin Cronin, in a 2006 lecture about fiction writing, makes the distinction between form and “its cheesy cousin, form-ula.”  I find it useful to understand the distinction as it applies just as well to building design.  Form is the framework for ordering the space whereas formula is a preconceived ordering by proxy ‘rules’; rules which I have never found to be anything but arbitrary and based on biases from one source or another.  A quick read of a building covenant will reveal a few examples.

wdarchitects-cellar
Tread carefully

When I’m talking here about design, my aim is to explain and encourage a way out of a formulaic approach.  In building, design by formula is typically not design at all, in any meaningful sense.

You could begin the design of a house by deciding on what rooms types you want and how big each must be.  You then cut out rectangles to scale from a piece of paper and arrange them into a ‘design.’  This approach is not unlike playing with a Rubix Cube.  The outcome of the exercise is one of a very narrow range of possibilities which are only possible because so many aspects of the design potential have been preconceived (such as it will have a hip roof as that can cover just about any rectilinear shape, and so it will have flat ceilings) – thus the vast majority of project homes around the world, for example, take on very similar characteristics.  It’s arranging the deck chairs not on the Titanic, but on a barge…utilitarian, functional (to a point), achieving an end, carrying you solidly along life’s journey, but hardly inspiring, uplifting, nor simply being a nice place to live.  And crucially, as I suggested in my last post, there can be some real negative effects to poor design.

The most useful question at every point in developing a design is, “why?”  That question is the best way to test whether you’re getting at the root of the design potential or just starting from a preconceived notion.

I’ll illustrate: You want an open-plan living, dining, kitchen.  Why?  Because:

  • Good for cross-ventilation
  • Good for entertaining so the person in the kitchen can interact with guests
  • Umm…we like it when the food processor drowns out the TV

Does the TV noise conflict with the entertaining?

Ah, maybe we should have an open plan dining/kitchen and a separate living room.  Maybe big doors between them so we have options.  Maybe we should have a walk-in pantry/larder with a benchtop, for noisy appliances.  Maybe we should have extra-wide eaves on the deck so entertaining can happen out there in all weather; in that case maybe the deck should be sheltered by a wall on the west…

…and there you have the beginnings of real design decisions.

Everything is connected…entertaining in all weather suggests a wall on the west of the deck, therefore the plan of the house becomes ‘L’ shaped with the separate living room in that position with big doors to the dining/kitchen, so you really have options, and forget the larder because that’s just more to clean.  The plan shape helps to catch the cooling north-east breeze and all rooms can still be single-width so cross ventilation works well.  Etc, etc, etc.

Understand why you want things a certain way…look at the possibilities and design to make them happen.

 

 

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

|

Global Site Search

Your details will never be shared with any third party. Unsubscribe at any time with a single click.

The posts on this site sometimes contain an affiliate link or links to Amazon or other marketplaces. An affiliate link means that this business may earn advertising or referral fees if you make a purchase through those links.